Craftwork: Will we soon see GIs for sombrero hats and Bruges lace?

Negotiations between the EU and Mexico on an updated Free Trade Agreement could potentially open the door to non-agricultural geographical indications (GIs). Time will tell if the EU is ready to embrace protection for handicrafts however, as Jochen Baes explains.

Protected designations for Sombreros de San Pancho, Scottish tartans and even Antwerp diamonds or Bruges lace may soon follow under plans for IP currently being reviewed by the European Commission.

What is a geographical indication?

If a product has a specific geographical origin, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic is essentially attributable to its geographical origin, it may be protected with a geographical indication (GI).

The EU allows for the protection of three types of GIs, namely: ‘protected designation of origins’ (PDO), ‘protected geographical indications’ (PGI), and ‘traditional specialties guaranteed’ (TSG). These are used to protect and promote quality agricultural products and foodstuffs (e.g. Gorgonzola cheese), spirits, wines and aromatised wines (e.g. Scotch Whisky and Champagne).

Non-agricultural GI products are protected in some European member states through legal instruments, such as consumer law, unfair competition, trademark law or sui generis GI systems, but not in the European Union as a whole.

A Free Trade Agreement for a new era

The original EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement was signed at the end of the previous millennium and entered into force at the dawn of the current one.

Since then, the world has changed a lot of course. Now we use tablets, drive electrical scooters, watch television on demand, private companies are taking us to space and European nations have become used to paying in euro instead of franc, mark or peseta. One thing that has not changed, however, is our love for food and drinks.

With a market of 130 million people, Mexico is the EU’s number one trading partner in Latin America. It is not surprising, therefore, that one of the EU’s aims during negotiations on an updated agreement, was to secure protection for European foods, wines and spirits in Mexico under the GI system.

In April this year, those negotiations were successfully concluded, pending approval by both sides. The agreement now covers a broader range of sectors, such as finance, eCommerce, agriculture and GIs.

Adding crafts to food and drink?

During negotiations, Mexico found itself to be outmatched on the topic of fine food GIs, as it only had a few dozen of its own food and drink GIs that it could protect in Europe. Negotiators sought to expand the GI provisions, therefore, to include handicrafts, such as sombreros, pottery, guitars and toys.

Despite this, the final wording of the updated agreement on non-agricultural GIs is not legally binding. An IP sub-committee will now have to decide whether to add products that are protectable under the agreement. However, this will only become possible for non-agricultural GIs, if the EU creates a suitable legal framework for such goods. As long as the EU does not have a proper legal framework for non-agricultural GIs, their protection will never kick in.

Is this likely to change?

Similar trade deals to the EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement have been negotiated in recent years, without any noticeable effect on IP protection. Nonetheless, this latest agreement could well be the test for how far GI rules might be extended to non-agricultural goods in the years to come

For years already, the EU Commission has been exploring the possibility of extending GI protection to non-agricultural products at EU level in order to harmonise the patchwork of laws that exist at national level in EU member states. After decades of studies, public consultations and strategies, it is now working on an action plan on IP, so the topic of non-agricultural GIs may be very well included.

It is important to note that this would impact not only the protection of goods outside the EU. If the bloc does introduce a pan-European legal framework of non-agricultural GIs, it could also open up protection of European goods, such as Solingen knives, Antwerp diamonds and Bruges lace. For now, we recommend consulting with your local attorney on the best methods of protection for handicraft and similar products in your countries of operation.

Jochen Baes is a Trademark and Design Attorney in Novagraaf’s Brussels office.

Insights liés

Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] La liste des finalistes aux « European Inventor Award » dévoilée

La cérémonie du Prix de l’Inventeur Européen 2024 se déroulera à Malte le 9 juillet prochain. L’OEB vient de dévoiler la liste des douze finalistes. Comme chaque année, le public peut voter pour l’un des douze inventeurs dans le cadre du Prix du Public. Découvrez les finalistes et voter pour le prix du public.

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
[Blog] La liste des finalistes aux « European Inventor Award » dévoilée
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] « Faute de grives je bois du merle » - Une idée marketing ingénieuse devenue contrefaçon

Le 21 février 2024, la Cour d’Appel de Paris a rendu son verdict concernant la marque de négoce « Faute de grives je bois du merle ». Clin d’œil à l’adage, ou subtile moquerie. Étaient visées les marques « Premières Grives » et « Dernières Grives », défendues vigoureusement par la société Tariquet. En effet, le domaine de Tariquet présente un quasi-monopole sur le terme « Grives » et sur la représentation de petits oiseaux ressemblants, pour désigner des vins moelleux d’IGP Côtes de Gascogne. Les deux négociants ont été condamnés pour contrefaçon et concurrence déloyale. Lire la suite

Par Novagraaf Team,
[Blog] « Faute de grives je bois du merle » - Une idée marketing ingénieuse devenue contrefaçon
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Héritiers d'Uzi Nissan récupèrent <nissan.com> et <nissan.net> après un long conflit

La société automobile Nissan a lutté pendant des années pour récupérer les noms de domaine et auprès de son titulaire, Uzi Nissan, fondateur de Nissan Computer. Elle a échoué, mais Uzi Nissan a dépensé plus de 3 millions de dollars pour combattre Nissan automobile au cours d'une bataille, de huit ans, débutée en 1999. Lire la suite

Par Marc-Emmanuel Mellet,
[Blog] Héritiers d'Uzi Nissan récupèrent <nissan.com> et <nissan.net> après un long conflit

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous