Assessing whether a mark is ‘well known’

The criteria for a mark to be ‘well known’ is higher than the assessment criteria for trademarks with reputation (Chevy, C-375/97), and decisions can vary considerably between EU member states, as Casper Hemelrijk explains.

Providing the necessary level of evidence to prove that a sign is well known can cause issues for unregistered rights holders. The required level of recognition to be considered well known can also differ between EU member states, since there are no specific legislative criteria to assess marks, and interpretation of case law can vary.

Criteria for assessment

In Boomerang (T-420/03), the General Court of the EU decided that the competent authority can consider any circumstances from which it may be inferred that the mark is well known, including:

  • The degree of knowledge or recognition of the mark in the relevant sector of the public;
  • The duration, extent and geographical area of any use of the mark;
  • The duration, extent and geographical area of any promotion of the mark, including advertising or publicity and the presentation, at fair or exhibitions of the goods and/or services to which the mark applies;
  • The duration and geographical area of any registrations, and/or any applications for registration, of the mark, to the extent to which they reflect use or recognition of the mark;
  • The record of successful enforcement of rights in the mark, in particular, the extent to which the mark has been recognised as well known by competent authorities;
  • The value associated with the mark.

As mentioned above, the trademark offices of the member states have their own discretion in deciding whether a mark is well known, and the required rate of recognition can differ between the member states therefore. For example, the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) is stricter and more hesitant to recognise marks as well known, as compared to the EUIPO.

For further advice or support, please speak to your Novagraaf attorney or contact us below.

Casper Hemelrijk works at Novagraaf’s Competence Centre in Amsterdam.

Insights liés

Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Marques de position : trouver chaussure à son pied en termes de distinctivité

La Chambre des recours de l’EUIPO a récemment eu à juger de la distinctivité d’une marque de position caractérisée par l’élément en noir sur le côté d'une chaussure. L’EUIPO a ici initialement refusé la marque à l’enregistrement pour défaut de caractère distinctif, mais la Chambre des recours a annulé ce refus. Lire la suite

Par Marine Deniau,
[Blog] Marques de position : trouver chaussure à son pied en termes de distinctivité
Vins et spiritueux

Accord Européen pour les Indications Géographiques Agricoles

Après environ deux années de négociation, le 24 octobre dernier, les négociateurs du Parlement européen et du Conseil de l'UE sont parvenus à un accord politique sur la réforme des règles européennes relatives aux Indications géographiques (IG), qui crée un règlement unique couvrant les produits agricoles et alimentaires, les vins et les boissons spiritueuses.

Par Florence Chapin,
Accord Européen pour les Indications Géographiques Agricoles

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous

Confidentialité et cookies

Pour fournir la meilleure expérience possible aux visiteurs du site Web, Novagraaf utilise des cookies. En cliquant sur "Accepter" ou en continuant d’utiliser le site, vous acceptez notre politique de confidentialité, y compris la politique en matière de cookies.