Registering character marks: The case of ‘Uncle Sam’ 

An application to register Uncle Sam as a figurative trademark has been refused by the USPTO on the grounds of its iconic character and cultural significance, as Theo Visser explains.

The Uncle Sam character (shown below) was famously designed in 1917 by James Montgomery Flagg for use in an army recruitment poster. The popular character is easily recognisable thanks to its long white hair, white beard and a top hat, and is considered an important symbol of US patriotism.

Uncle Sam character

Nonetheless, a German retailer of sporting goods, Uncle Sam GmbH, applied for an International Registration, Uncle Same GMBHdesignating the US, to protect its Uncle Sam logo (pictured, right) for, among other things, food. The application was refused and Uncle Sam GmbH appealed against this refusal to the Board of Appeal. 

Barriers to trademark registration

Defending the application, the company argued that its use of the image was consistent with a long history of the image being used for advertising purposes. The Board of Appeal agreed with this argument, but found that the Uncle Sam image could not serve as a trademark since the function of a trademark was to distinguish the origin of a product or service. As the image has been used so extensively to advertise various products and services, it had essentially become too generic a mark to be registrable.

As Uncle Sam GmbH also argued, there are a number of US trademark registrations already in place for Uncle Sam, as well as other iconic characters, such as the Statue of Liberty and the Mona Lisa. The Board of Appeal’s ruling did not touch on this argument, however, as it had already refused the application on the grounds outlined above. 

For more on the challenges and benefits of registering fictional characters as trademarks, please read our article ‘Character wars: Trademark and copyright protection for fictional characters’.

Theo Visser is an IP consultant in the Amsterdam offices of Novagraaf.

Latest news

Webinars & events

[Webinar] Online marketplace brand protection: Who is liable for the sale of counterfeit goods?

Who is liable for the sale of counterfeit goods on e-commerce platforms, such as online marketplaces? In our 14 November webinar, our experts will took a deep dive into EU case law on liability for the sale of counterfeit goods online and share monitoring and enforcement best practices for online marketplace brand protection.

[Webinar] Online marketplace brand protection: Who is liable for the sale of counterfeit goods?

For more information, please contact us

Cookie policy

To provide the best possible experience for website visitors, Novagraaf uses cookies. By clicking "Accept" or continuing using the site, you agree to our privacy policy, including our cookie policy.