Trademark documents and electronic signatures – an update

Par Laura Morrish,

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed new challenges to companies and their legal advisers, including that of obtaining the necessary signatures for the execution of documents. In response, the Law Commission has issue an updated guidance note, as Laura Morrish explains.

As we covered previously, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the ways in which trademark professionals manage routine tasks. While technology has enabled us to rapidly transition to working from home, obtaining necessary signatures requires even more advance planning at this time of social distancing.

As predicted in that earlier article, the UK’s lockdown, added to the already increasing demand for flexibility in respect of witness documents, has acted as a catalyst for the Law Commission to push forward its work on reform in this area. On 18 June 2020, it updated its guidance note in relation to the virtual execution of documents and the use of e-signatures to include tips on how to operate in practice in the current, challenging circumstances.

Law Commission best practice tips and advice

Its tips are as follows:

  • 1. Follow the Law Commission’s best practice notes for executing documents by virtual means and executing documents using electronic signatures;
  • 2. Agree: All parties should agree on how best to manage the transaction;
  • 3. Verify: Consider what steps (if any) should be taken to verify the identity and authority of each person signing beyond that which is required by law, including the anti-money laundering regime;
  • 4. Evidence: Ensure any evidence required for verification is easily accessible;
  • 5. Report: Notify all parties when the transaction has been closed; and
  • 6. Understand: Make sure that you’re aware of the legislative, regulatory or cultural requirements for virtual execution and e-signatures in the relevant legal area.

What does this mean for trademark owners?

Current circumstances have made the execution of documents more difficult of course; however, with the right preparation and forethought, it is possible to meet deadline and formality requirements. In line with the above guidance, we advise:

  1. Prepare for the execution of documents as early as possible, in order to agree a method of signature that is acceptable to all parties and still legally binding in the relevant jurisdictions.
  2. Prepare images of signatures and/or electronic signatures and arrange for documents to be scanned or printed so that signatories can easily access them.
  3. Consider arranging for original documents to be posted between the parties for physical signature, where electronic signatures are not accepted (e.g. outside the UK and EU).
  4. Check in advance if witnessing is required and, if so, what form of witnessing would be acceptable in order to meet local requirements.
  5. Allow sufficient time to have any documents notarised and where legalisation is required, make third parties aware of the limited service being offered in the UK.

For further guidance on managing signatures, witnesses, notarisation and legalisation, please speak to your Novagraaf attorney or contact us below.

Laura Morrish is a Chartered Trademark Attorney at Novagraaf in the UK. 

Insights liés

Nova IP Hour

Rencontre entre l’OEB et l’OAPI au sujet de la future réforme de l’OAPI

Le 26 avril dernier, les Présidents de l’OEB et de l’OAPI se sont entretenus en visioconférence. Il a notamment été question de la réforme des brevets à venir à l’OAPI en 2025, avec l’instauration d’un système de validation des brevets similaire au système européen. L’OEB a rappelé sa volonté d’accompagner l’OAPI dans ces changements, à la fois sur les plans juridique, administratif et technique. Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
Rencontre entre l’OEB et l’OAPI au sujet de la future réforme de l’OAPI
Nova IP Hour

Rapport de la Commission européenne sur les pays à risque en matière de Propriété Intellectuelle

La Commission européenne vient de publier son rapport biannuel, déterminant les « pays prioritaires », hors de l’UE, au seins desquels la protection et l’application des droits de propriété intellectuelle sont les plus préoccupants d’un point de vue économique. La Chine demeure le premier pays prioritaire pour l'UE, et pour cause, les dépôts frauduleux restent nombreux et ce pays est toujours le principal pays de provenance (70 %) des marchandises soupçonnées de contrefaçon. Suivent en priorité 2 l’Inde et la Turquie. Lire la suite

Par Carole Roger,
Rapport de la Commission européenne sur les pays à risque en matière de Propriété Intellectuelle

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous

Confidentialité et cookies

Pour fournir la meilleure expérience possible aux visiteurs du site Web, Novagraaf utilise des cookies. En cliquant sur "Accepter" ou en continuant d’utiliser le site, vous acceptez notre politique de confidentialité, y compris la politique en matière de cookies.