Game of Thrones loses ground in skirmish with vaping brand

US TV network HBO has failed in its attempt to oppose the registration of ‘Game of Vapes’, after the UKIPO disagreed with its argument that the similarity of the vaping brand name was likely to cause confusion with the well-known TV series Game of Thrones.

The ‘Game of Vapes’ figurative trademark application (pictured, right)Game of Vapes dates from 2017, covering tobacco, smoker’s items and matches. HBO owned an earlier registration for ‘Game of Thrones’ (pictured, below) also covering, among other things, smoking products, including cigars, cigarette cases and ashtrays.

Likelihood of confusion?

The US network argued that, due to the similarity of both the brand names and the products, the vaping company would benefit from the reputation, reputation and prestige of the TV series if the application was permitted, and that dilution of the ‘Game of Thrones’ brand could also occur as a result. It also had concerns that the average consumer might believe there was a commercial relationship in place between the two brands.

Game of Thrones logoHowever, in its ruling, the UKIPO did not find there to be sufficient similarity between the brand names. While the word ‘game’ is identical in both brand names, the words ‘thrones’ and ‘vapes’ are not. It also disagreed with HBO’s argument that consumers may mistakenly believe there is a link between the two companies, finding there to be enough conceptual differences between the brand for the consumer to understand that ‘Game of Vapes’ was a ‘comedic play on Game of Thrones’. Likewise, it disagreed with the TV network’s argument that the ‘Game of Thrones’ brand was being damaged by any association with a vaping brand. The merchandising activities of a successful TV series are different from those in the e-cigarette sector.

Parody or threat?

Global use of e-cigarettes and e-liquids has grown exponentially in recent years, and the promotion of such products, especially via the internet and high-street vape shops, is on the rise. So too are instances of trademark infringement in the sector against well-known brands. For more on this topic, including advice on both naming vape products and acting against infringement, please read our article ‘Up in smoke? Trademark infringement and e-cigarettes’.

Insights liés

Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] JUB – Décision concernant l’accessibilité aux informations à des fins d'éducation et de formation

En juin 2023, la société Ocado a intenté une action en contrefaçon contre la société Autostore auprès de la Division régionale nordique et baltique du Tribunal de la JUB, pour statuer sur la contrefaçon et rendre des ordonnances sur la base de ces contrefaçons alléguées. La procédure a ensuite été clôturée car les parties avaient trouvé un accord. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
[Blog] JUB – Décision concernant l’accessibilité aux informations à des fins d'éducation et de formation
JUB

La feuille de route de la juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

La Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB) est officiellement lancée depuis le 1er juin 2023. Grâce à cette feuille de route, parcourez aisément l'actualité de la JUB et son évolution, au travers des articles de décryptage de nos experts. Retrouvez ci-dessous nos publications pour suivre les spécificités de la JUB en temps réel afin de mieux comprendre les conséquences associées et déterminer votre stratégie de protection en Europe.

La feuille de route de la juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Soutien de l'innovation : L'OEB réduit les taxes de 30% pour les micro-entités

L'Office Européen des Brevets annonce une baisse de 30% des taxes pour les micro-entités, comprenant microentreprises, individus, ONG, universités et organismes de recherche. Les principales taxes de délivrance de brevets sont concernées mais sous certaines conditions. Lire la suite

Par Novagraaf Team,
[Blog] Soutien de l'innovation : L'OEB réduit les taxes de 30% pour les micro-entités

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous