How to challenge unfair commercial practices by competitors

Par Novagraaf Team,
How to challenge unfair commercial practices by competitors

Unfair commercial practices not only prevent consumers from making informed decisions; they also impact the bottom line and reputation of the impacted companies. Noa Rubingh sets out how to take action.

While legal protection against unfair commercial practices seems primarily aimed at safeguarding consumers, companies can also rely on these provisions to challenge unfair commercial practices by competitors. In the EU, this was established in the RLvS v Stuttgarter Wochenblatt judgement handed down by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in 2013:

"It is common ground that RLvS did not act in the name of or on behalf of those undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Directive 2005/29 [The European Unfair Commercial Practices Directive]. In such a scenario, and given its ratione personae scope, Directive 2005/29 is indeed intended to protect consumers of products and services of those same undertakings and their legitimate competitors."

When is a commercial practice by a competitor considered unfair?

However, a mere finding that unfair commercial practices have taken place is insufficient to invoke the Directive’s provisions. The (derivative) aim of the Directive is to protect companies from harming their economic interests (clause 6), thus ensuring fair competition (clause 8).

Instead, the company’s competitive position must have been harmed by the unfair commercial practices for the protection granted by the Directive to be invoked. The threat of harm, as in tort, is sufficient for this purpose. For example, a single misleading advertisement is considered sufficient to affect the company’s competitive position. 

In addition, the term 'competitor' is interpreted broadly in the Directive. Even if the claimant company is not a competitor in the narrow sense – for example, it does not offer the same or similar products or services – its competitive position may still be harmed by an unfair business-to-consumer (B2C) practice.

If you think your business has been impacted by unfair commercial practices, speak to your attorney to find out if and how to take action. 

Noa Rubingh works at Novagraaf’s Knowledge Management department in Amsterdam

Insights liés

Articles

Pen Pineapple Apple Peine

Alexis Thiebaut revient sur l’affaire qui oppose la société Apple Inc. au label japonais Avex Inc., puisque ce dernier a voulu profiter du succès de leur tube PPAP, Pen Pineapple Apple Pen en déposant la marque internationale Pen Pineapple Apple Pen.

Par Alexis Thiebaut,
Pen Pineapple Apple Peine
Nova IP Hour

La fin du papier pour les enveloppes Soleau

Le décret n° 2023-166 s’intéresse à la modernisation du système de l’enveloppe Soleau. L'article R. 411-1 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle comprend notamment une modification relative aux décisions du directeur général de l’INPI en ce qu’il « peut prévoir que ce dépôt [d’enveloppe Soleau], ainsi que toute transmission ou communication relative à cette procédure, s'effectue uniquement sous forme électronique ». A partir du 1er avril 2023 débutera une période transitoire d'un an pendant laquelle les enveloppes papier en circulation peuvent encore être déposées. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
La fin du papier pour les enveloppes Soleau

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous

Confidentialité et cookies

Pour fournir la meilleure expérience possible aux visiteurs du site Web, Novagraaf utilise des cookies. En cliquant sur "Accepter" ou en continuant d’utiliser le site, vous acceptez notre politique de confidentialité, y compris la politique en matière de cookies.