Brexit and IP: Your FAQs answered
Welcome to our FAQs on Brexit and your IP. Please click the questions in the list below to read the detailed responses. If you have any questions about Brexit and your IP portfolio that aren't covered below, or would like to speak to an IP adviser for detailed responses, don't hesitate to get in touch with our Brexit taskforce.
Cloning of EU rights
All cloned UK rights have been automatically created in our IP management software and are therefore visible to clients on EasyIP. The cloned rights are recognisable by their unique numbers (see below).
It is not a requirement to appoint a UK representative for a cloned UK right during the first three years of its life, i.e. until 2024. However, it is advisable to provide a UK address for service for all UK registrations in case any issues arise in the UK (see ‘Brexit and IP: Understanding the UKIPO address for service rules change’ for more information on the rules regarding a UK address for service).
The number allocated to the cloned UK trademark is the last eight digits of the EU trademark (EUTM) prefixed with UK009.With regard to new UK rights created from the EU designation of an International registration (IR), the number allocated to the cloned trademark is the last eight digits of the IR (EU designation) prefixed with UK008. This provides users with a means to identify UK rights created from International registrations and to distinguish them from existing UK trademarks.With regard to Registered Community designs (RCDs), to distinguish the re-registered designs from existing UK registered designs, the number allocated to them consists of the full 13-digit RCD number prefixed with the digit ‘9’.
Conversion applications
To benefit from the conversion process and to retain the same filing date as the pending EU right, you must apply to register the same trademark as a UK right within nine months after the end of the transition period, this being up to and including 30 September 2021.
The application for a UK conversion is not tied to the pending EUTM and can therefore proceed to registration, even if the EUTM application is ultimately rejected. The UK right can be opposed separately, but the opponent would need to rely on rights that are valid in the UK. Where an EUTM is registered but was already subject to cancellation when the UK left the EU, there will be an automatic clone and this right will be tied to the outcome of the cancellation action at the EUIPO.
A UK address for service is required for all new UK applications after 31 December 2020 (see ‘Brexit and IP: Understanding the UKIPO address for service rules change’ for more information on the rules regarding a UK address for service).
Please contact your Novagraaf attorney, or contact us here to appoint Novagraaf as your UK address for service so we can proceed with UK conversions on your behalf.
Renewals
As long as the EUTM is renewed within the six-month late renewal grace period, then a UK right will automatically be created and renewed without additional cost. This only applies to EUTMs that were due for renewal prior to 31 December 2020.
No, early renewal will not avoid the payment of fees for the renewal of the cloned UK right.
UK cloned rights can be renewed any time after they were created on 1 January 2021, but only within the six months prior to their renewal deadline. Any newly created UK right that is due for renewal within six months of 1 January 2021 will benefit from a further six-month period after its expiry, during which it can be renewed for no additional official fees.
Contentious proceedings
If the action is based solely on UK rights, it will be dismissed. If there are other EU-wide rights that are relied on, the opposition/cancellation will proceed based solely on those rights.
Where an EU trademark was subject to ongoing cancellation proceedings at the end of the transition period, a UK right will have been created. If the EUTM is subsequently cancelled, the outcome shall be applied to the corresponding UK cloned right as well. The cancellation of the UK right is not automatic and must be requested by the claimant at the UKIPO.
There is an exception where the grounds for cancelling the EU trademark would not apply in the UK. In this case, the UK right will not be cancelled. This is referred to as a derogation.
Any cancellation action filed against an EUTM after 1 January 2021 will have no effect on the cloned UK registration.
Any EU rights which were registered by the end of the transition period have been automatically cloned as registered national UK rights and there will be no new opposition period. The newly created, cloned UK rights will, however, be subject to invalidation/revocation proceedings as per any other registered right.
Yes, by opposing the EUTM you will delay its registration until after the UK leaves the EU. The EUTM owner will then have to file a conversion application in the UK, which could be opposed on the basis of the UK rights.
Beyond the normal process for extending opposition periods from two months to three months, UK opposition periods cannot be extended to await the re-filing of a UK application based on a pending EUTM/IR(EU). Similarly, invalidation actions cannot be based on converted earlier marks until they have been re-filed.
However, parties can request that a ground of opposition/invalidation based on a subsequently re-filed pending EUTM/IR(EU) be added to proceedings which have been launched on the basis of other grounds/marks. This only applies to invalidations or oppositions filed on or after 31 December 2020 against trademarks which were themselves filed on or after the UK’s departure from the EU. The tribunal will take all factors into account when deciding whether to grant such a request.
These proceedings will be dealt with under the Act as it existed before Brexit. In this scenario, EUTMs and IR(EU)s will continue to constitute earlier trademarks for the purpose of the proceedings. This applies to both registered and pending marks, although, in respect of pending marks will be subject to the earlier mark subsequently being registered. In these proceedings it will not be possible to substitute in, or add, comparable marks or re-filed EUTM/IR(EU)s.
Use and reputation
- UK perspective:
- EU perspective:
Designs
Designs that were protected in the UK as UCDs before 1 January 2021 continue to be protected as UK continuing unregistered designs and were automatically established on 1 January 2021. The designs continue to be protected in the UK for the remainder of the three-year term attached to them.
If a corresponding UCD was established before 1 January 2021 through first disclosure in the EU but outside of the UK, this will not affect the validity of the continuing unregistered design.
From the end of the transition period, qualifications for the UK design right are limited to:
- people resident in the UK or a qualifying country
- businesses formed under the laws of the UK or a qualifying country
Where qualification is a result of first marketing, you will need to have disclosed your design in the UK or a qualifying country.
It is not possible to have ‘dual disclosure’ of a design in both the UK and the EU, first disclosure can only be in the UK or EU. Protection will be given in the jurisdiction where first disclosure of the design occurs.
No, where publication of a design was deferred as of 31 December 2020, the design would not have been automatically cloned. Its owner can apply to the UKIPO for a conversion (as they would for pending trademark/designs) but they would not have benefited from automatic cloning because the RCD was considered pending as of 31 December 2020.
Customs AFAs
As of 1 January 2021, any existing EU application for action (AFA) filed in a member state other than the UK, no longer includes the UK. In this case, a new UK specific AFA should be filed if protection is required in the UK.
If the EU AFA was filed via UK customs, it will remain valid in the UK but not the other EU member states. In this scenario, a new EU AFA should be filed via one of the remaining EU member states.
UKIPO fees
We are not aware of any changes to the UKIPO's fees, other than the waiving of late renewal fees for cloned UK rights in certain circumstances.
Representation
Yes, the representative for the EU designation of the IR would have been automatically recorded against the cloned UK registration.
The cloned right would have inherited the representative details and address for service from the EUIPO. So if that was the WIPO representative, this would be the same for the UK right. If, however, the EU designation has no representative at the EUIPO, the UK right would also be without a representative. The details would not have been taken from WIPO.
With cloned rights arising from EUTMs and RCDs, no changes to representatives and/or addresses for service will be required for three years (the three-year grace period).
However, cloned rights arising from International (EU designation) trademarks and International (EU designation) designs will be treated as pure UK Rights. The three-year grace period will not apply. Instead, they will have to follow exactly the same address for service changes for directly filed domestic UK applications after the end of the transition period. .
So, a UK, Gibraltar or Channel Islands address for service will be required if any proceedings such as opposition, cancellation, invalidation etc. are initiated after the end of the transition period on any of these IR cloned rights.
If there is no representative, then communication would be with the rights holder and subject to the address for service changes summarised here.
Geographical indications
Geographical indications that are currently registered in the European Union, and those that will be entered into the register by the end of the transition period, will remain protected in the UK after the end of the transition period, without the need to re-file in the UK or to undertake any administrative procedures to ensure such protection.
The registration in the UK of the stock of EU geographical indications will be free of charge..
There will be a new system in place for the protection of GIs in the UK. It will be necessary to apply separately for protection in the UK for any new GIs filed after 1 January 2021.
Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs)
Granted UK SPCs will remain valid, with no change to their term. SPC applications filed in the UK by 31 December 2020 will continue to progress – re-filing is not required – in addition, once granted, they will provide the same rights.
For applications filed on or after 1 January 2021, an application for an SPC will still require a UK or EP(UK) granted patent, as well as a marketing authorisation which is valid in the UK. However, the process of applying for a marketing authorisation will be different.
Currently, marketing authorisations are granted either by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) or by the UK Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Where a marketing authorisation has, before 2021, been granted by the European Medicines Agency, it will be converted on 1 January 2021 into an equivalent UK authorisation.
From 1 January 2021 the MHRA will be the UK’s stand-alone medicines and medical devices regulator, taking decisions and carrying out functions which were taken or carried out at EU-level. There is, however, an exception to this: Under the Northern Ireland (NI) protocol, NI will still be bound by EU law for the authorisation of medicines and plant protection products. As a result, decisions on Marketing Authorisation applications for Northern Ireland will continue to be made centrally, by the EMA.
These factors means that, from 1 January 2021, three types of Marketing Authorisations will be possible:
- MAs which have been converted from existing EMA MAs: valid across the whole UK;
- MAs granted by the EMA: valid for NI;
- MAs granted by the MHRA: valid in England, Scotland and Wales only.
Currently, EU law provides for a six-month extension to an SPC which relates to a medicinal product for children for which data has been submitted according to a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP). From 1 January 2021 equivalent provisions will be introduced under the UK’s Human Medicines Regulations 2012. The process of applying for an extension will remain the same, and can be made at the same time as filing the SPC application or at any point up to two years before the SPC expires. The same conditions for grant will need to be met, however it will no longer be necessary to provide evidence of authorisations covering the product across the EEA.
A manufacturing waiver relating to SPCs and based in EU legislation came into force on 1 July 2019 which allows manufacturers to make SPC-protected medicines for export outside the EU without the consent of the rights holder. It also allows making and storage of medicines during the last six months of an SPC ready for a Day One launch in the EU after the SPC expires.
Following a call for views by the government on the UK version of the waiver, UK legislation has been enacted confirming that the manufacturing waiver will be retained. As such, third parties will continue to be able to make SPC-protected products in the UK for export to countries outside of the UK and EU and, in the final six months of the SPC, to store SPC-protected products in the UK for sale in the UK or EU on expiry of the SPC.
Visit our dedicated Brexit microsite
Latest news
Hot topics
New year’s resolutions: Give your IP portfolio a fresh start
Get your IP strategy off to a great start in 2021 by beginning the year with a review of your portfolio. A thorough audit of your IP now could help you to identify ways to streamline and exploit your portfolio ready for another potentially challenging year, and could save you money as well improving the efficiency of your assets.
News & opinion
Groundhog Day for the Unitary Patent?
The German Bundestag and Bundesrat approved the draft law ratifying the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court in November 2020. In theory, that means the Unitary Patent could come into force in 2022. If only, things were that simple, says Robert Balsters.
News & opinion
Frigidaire: EU General Court casts a chill on the notion of genuine use
Decision in 'Frigidaire' provides a reminder of the importance, yet difficulty, of quantifying and assessing genuine use. Trademark owners cannot be reminded enough of the vigilance that is necessary in this area.