Countdown to INTA 2023: Brand protection is not only trademarks

Par Luke Portnow,
Brand protection globe puzzle

This year's Annual Meeting of the International Trademark Association (INTA) will be in Singapore (16-20 May) and promises to be packed with fascinating discussions. The sessions scheduled at the conference remind us that trademarks are not the only rights to consider when looking at brand protection.

INTA annual conferences have a true personal side, but away from the coffee meetings and receptions, the official talks focus our minds and many this year have emphasis on the areas of blockchain, trade dress, copyright, and registered designs.  These complementary areas are all key and fit nicely alongside our core field: the protection and enforcement of intellectual property. 

Just as meeting for a drink goes hand-in-hand with developing working relationships around the globe, so do these other areas of law on the periphery, when it comes to considering the useful protection and enforcement of trademarks. 

Trademarks are defined under the EU Trade Mark Regulation and UK Trade Marks Act, and many other statutes around the world, as 'any sign capable of distinguishing goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings'.  The problem is that monopoly trademark rights are often refused registration owing to function. This means being deemed, for example, a shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves, something necessary to obtain a technical result, or simply a purported trademark which 'adds substantial value' or in other words, is aesthetically too pleasing for registration. (For more information, watch our recent webinar on protecting product packaging here.)

Such talks scheduled for INTA's meeting highlight that, even at an prestigious important global event for our field, trademarks are not the only rights to consider when looking to protect and enforce intellectual property rights.  

Design rights

A design right, for one, is a commonly forgotten but very effective IP right. Also known as 'trade dress' around the world, if registered, it provides the owner with 25 years of protection to the design and any design similar enough not to produce a different overall impression on the relevant public. 

The test for infringement for a registered design does not actually require any confusion or misrepresentation as to the origin: it is all about whether the other product looks too similar to the registered design. The question is whether the ‘overall impression’ is the same or different in the eyes of an informed user.

A useful recent (United Kingdom) example of this was in the ruling on a dispute between long-standing litigation Marks & Spencer and budget supermarket chain Aldi.  M&S was able to successfully rely on four UK registered designs to protect itself and enforce against the appearance of a light-up gin bottle which (subject to appeal) Aldi is now injuncted from using and must deliver up and/or destroy.  Registered design rights won the day, where trademark law could not. 


Copyright is a long-standing acknowledged IP right transcending borders since its first formal establishment under the Berne Convention in 1886.  In more modern times, we also now look to blockchain to record creation and automatic associated rights during the process of agency or employee creation.

Passing off

The discussions also remind us that, in many jurisdictions, torts such as ‘passing off’ can be successfully relied upon under common law, where statutory rights would otherwise fail a claimant.  This is especially important in the field of ‘get up’ and the ongoing concern of IP rights holders with ‘copycat’ or ‘lookalike’ products, particularly those created and sold by budget retailers. 

We look forward to sharing some brand protection insights from INTA's Annual Meeting in due course.  In the meantime, whether you're attending in person at the Sands Expo & Convention Center, Singapore (16-20 May) or joining online (27-29 June), our team of Novagraaf experts will be on hand to discuss your IP,  brand and trademark needs. We have a team of seven attending this year, providing a great opportunity for us to meet with clients and our agent network, and properly reconnect in person since the pandemic.

Contact us to set up a meeting for the Singapore conference or reach out directly to our attendees Aurélie GuetinBart SchweitzerHelma van de LangenbergIngrid MennensLuke PortnowLutgarde Liezenberg and Olivier Boland.

Insights liés

Nova IP Hour

Réunion PI relative aux ressources génétiques, aux savoirs traditionnels et au folklore

La réunion du Comité intergouvernemental de la PI relative aux ressources génétiques, aux savoirs traditionnels et au folklore se tiendra du 5 au 9 juin à Genève et de nombreux sujets devraient être abordés. En particulier, ce sera l’occasion pour les représentants des différents Etats membres de faire le point sur la propriété intellectuelle portant sur les savoirs traditionnels et les expressions culturelles traditionnelles. Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
Réunion PI relative aux ressources génétiques, aux savoirs traditionnels et au folklore
Nova IP Hour

Loi Evin : 37 publications d’influenceurs supprimées

Récemment, l’Association Addictions France a relevé plusieurs publications d’influenceurs sur Instagram associant la consommation d’alcool à des moments festifs et conviviaux ou à une image positive et ne comportaient pas, pour la plupart, la mention sanitaire obligatoire. Dans son jugement du 5 janvier 2023, le Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris a estimé que ces publications étaient contraires à la Loi Evin et qu’elles constituaient une promotion abusive des boissons alcoolisées. Il a condamné le groupe META à retirer les 37 publications Instagram illicites et à communiquer l’identité des auteurs de ces publications afin qu’ils soient eux-mêmes poursuivis. Lire la suite

Par Marion Mercadier,
Loi Evin : 37 publications d’influenceurs supprimées
Nova IP Hour

JO-PARIS 2024 : Attention à votre communication !

Les marques olympiques et les signes relatifs à l’évènement bénéficient d’une protection par le droit de marques, mais également par des dispositions spéciales qui renforcent considérablement cette protection. Attention à l'usage des offres spéciales « Paris 2024 », l’ajout des anneaux olympiques à son logo, les hashtags #jo, #jeuxolympiques, #paris2024 qui pourraient constituer une atteinte à leurs droits. Lire la suite

Par Marion Mercadier,
JO-PARIS 2024 : Attention à votre communication !

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous

Confidentialité et cookies

Pour fournir la meilleure expérience possible aux visiteurs du site Web, Novagraaf utilise des cookies. En cliquant sur "Accepter" ou en continuant d’utiliser le site, vous acceptez notre politique de confidentialité, y compris la politique en matière de cookies.