Countdown to INTA 2023: Brand protection is not only trademarks

Par Luke Portnow,
Brand protection globe puzzle

This year's Annual Meeting of the International Trademark Association (INTA) will be in Singapore (16-20 May) and promises to be packed with fascinating discussions. The sessions scheduled at the conference remind us that trademarks are not the only rights to consider when looking at brand protection.

INTA annual conferences have a true personal side, but away from the coffee meetings and receptions, the official talks focus our minds and many this year have emphasis on the areas of blockchain, trade dress, copyright, and registered designs.  These complementary areas are all key and fit nicely alongside our core field: the protection and enforcement of intellectual property. 

Just as meeting for a drink goes hand-in-hand with developing working relationships around the globe, so do these other areas of law on the periphery, when it comes to considering the useful protection and enforcement of trademarks. 

Trademarks are defined under the EU Trade Mark Regulation and UK Trade Marks Act, and many other statutes around the world, as 'any sign capable of distinguishing goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings'.  The problem is that monopoly trademark rights are often refused registration owing to function. This means being deemed, for example, a shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves, something necessary to obtain a technical result, or simply a purported trademark which 'adds substantial value' or in other words, is aesthetically too pleasing for registration. (For more information, watch our recent webinar on protecting product packaging here.)

Such talks scheduled for INTA's meeting highlight that, even at an prestigious important global event for our field, trademarks are not the only rights to consider when looking to protect and enforce intellectual property rights.  

Design rights

A design right, for one, is a commonly forgotten but very effective IP right. Also known as 'trade dress' around the world, if registered, it provides the owner with 25 years of protection to the design and any design similar enough not to produce a different overall impression on the relevant public. 

The test for infringement for a registered design does not actually require any confusion or misrepresentation as to the origin: it is all about whether the other product looks too similar to the registered design. The question is whether the ‘overall impression’ is the same or different in the eyes of an informed user.

A useful recent (United Kingdom) example of this was in the ruling on a dispute between long-standing litigation Marks & Spencer and budget supermarket chain Aldi.  M&S was able to successfully rely on four UK registered designs to protect itself and enforce against the appearance of a light-up gin bottle which (subject to appeal) Aldi is now injuncted from using and must deliver up and/or destroy.  Registered design rights won the day, where trademark law could not. 

Copyright

Copyright is a long-standing acknowledged IP right transcending borders since its first formal establishment under the Berne Convention in 1886.  In more modern times, we also now look to blockchain to record creation and automatic associated rights during the process of agency or employee creation.

Passing off

The discussions also remind us that, in many jurisdictions, torts such as ‘passing off’ can be successfully relied upon under common law, where statutory rights would otherwise fail a claimant.  This is especially important in the field of ‘get up’ and the ongoing concern of IP rights holders with ‘copycat’ or ‘lookalike’ products, particularly those created and sold by budget retailers. 

We look forward to sharing some brand protection insights from INTA's Annual Meeting in due course.  In the meantime, whether you're attending in person at the Sands Expo & Convention Center, Singapore (16-20 May) or joining online (27-29 June), our team of Novagraaf experts will be on hand to discuss your IP,  brand and trademark needs. We have a team of seven attending this year, providing a great opportunity for us to meet with clients and our agent network, and properly reconnect in person since the pandemic.

Contact us to set up a meeting for the Singapore conference or reach out directly to our attendees Aurélie GuetinBart SchweitzerHelma van de LangenbergIngrid MennensLuke PortnowLutgarde Liezenberg and Olivier Boland.

Insights liés

Articles

Évolution récentes autour de l’enveloppe Soleau

Cet article aborde l'évolution de l'enveloppe Soleau, un moyen de certifier la date de possession d'une invention. Depuis avril 2024, les dépôts papier ne sont plus acceptés, seuls les dépôts en ligne sont autorisés via le site de l'INPI. Nous précisons ici les modalités de dépôt, de conservation et de restitution de l'enveloppe, soulignant son rôle de preuve de possession antérieure, mais pas de propriété intellectuelle.

Par Adrien Metivet,
Évolution récentes autour de l’enveloppe Soleau
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Bilan de la procédure d’opposition à un brevet devant l’INPI

La mise en place de la loi PACTE il y a quatre ans a instauré une nouvelle procédure d'opposition des brevets devant l'INPI, marquant ainsi une évolution significative dans le paysage de la propriété industrielle en France. Récemment, l'INPI a publié un bilan détaillant les premières années de cette procédure, fournissant ainsi un aperçu des tendances et des résultats obtenus depuis son entrée en vigueur. Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
[Blog] Bilan de la procédure d’opposition à un brevet devant l’INPI
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Rétrospective sur l’impact de la pandémie du COVID-19 pour les contrefacteurs

L’Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE) et l’Office de l'Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO) ont réalisé une étude conjointe sur le « Commerce illicite de contrefaçons dans le contexte de la COVID-19 ». Cette étude met notamment en lumière les facteurs qui ont favorisé la diffusion de produits contrefaisants. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
[Blog] Rétrospective sur l’impact de la pandémie du COVID-19 pour les contrefacteurs

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous