Trademark management: Building a strategy for Europe

This is an excerpt from our white paper 'Best practices in Trademark Management: A practical guide'. Please click here to read the complete analysis and advice.

Novagraaf’s Chantal Koller on how businesses can adapt their trademark registration strategies to make best use of the opportunities offered by the EU trademark system.

Most businesses can make their European trademark (EUTM) registration and protection strategies, and budgets, work harder by taking some time to step back and examine their current portfolios. It is common to find, for example, doubling (and, in some cases, even tripling) of protection when it comes to national/EU and international coverage. This adds to the cost of renewals, and invariably also impacts budgets for the acquisition of future rights.

In some instances, it is sensible to retain those double rights; for example, if your mark could be at risk of revocation actions on the basis of non-use. However, it is likely that you will also identify duplicate marks that could be allowed to lapse, whether immediately or following some work on seniority claims.

Depending on the age of the portfolio, European rights should also be reviewed in light of recent changes in EUTM law and practice. Marks filed before June 2014 should be considered in light of the EUIPO (then OHIM) Convergence Programme. More recent rights and future filing strategies are also likely to benefit from some examination of recent EUTM reforms, as well as future planning in light of Brexit.

Time for a trademark healthcheck?

As we set out in previous articles on audits and valuation, portfolios require regular health checks to ensure that the rights they contain remain up-to-date both in terms of usage, but also in light of updates to trademark law and practice. If you haven’t already, reviewing your existing EU trademark portfolio with the changes above in mind will help you to identify which elements of protection should be added to the current status of registered marks. In particular:

  • Are your trademarks valid and in use in all key markets and territories?
  • Are your main logos protected in colour (as opposed to simply black and white)?
  • Are the specific goods/services that apply to your business still covered by the wording used in the (maybe historical) EUTM registration (Sieckmann/IP Translator)?
  • How well and differently are your ‘weak' (e.g. potentially descriptive) names protected in light of current EUIPO practice? For example, the use of graphic elements with non-distinctive word marks.
  • Are you taking advantage of the changes to the rules for graphical representation, e.g. to register non-traditional trademarks?

You can find further guidance on the relevant changes to EU trademark law and practice by downloading our white paper 'Best practices in trademark management: A practical guide'.

Looking beyond EUTMs – to the rest of Europe

Brexit has provided an important reminder that not all of Europe is covered by an EUTM. Once Britain fully exits from the EU system (click here for our latest overview and action points), brand owners seeking to obtain UK protection as part of their European trademark registration strategies will need to include an additional UK registration. If they’re not already, they should also include such registrations for other European, but non-EU, countries, such as Switzerland, which are often overlooked in European filing strategies.

For more information or guidance on developing a robust trademark filing strategy for Europe, speak to your Novagraaf attorney or contact us below.

Chantal Koller is Managing Director – Trademarks at Novagraaf in Switzerland.

Insights liés

Blog Nova IP Hour

Réductions de taxes pour les petites et micro-entités : un nouveau guide à l’OEB

Au 1er avril 2024, de nombreuses taxes ont été modifiées à l’OEB. A cette occasion, un guide dédié aux petites entités et micro-entités a été établit sous la forme d’une foire aux questions (FAQ). L’une des nouvelles mesures concerne les entités innovantes nécessitant un soutien financier, qui peuvent bénéficier d’une réduction de taxes de 30% (sous conditions). Lire la suite

Par Rose-Marie Ehanno,
Réductions de taxes pour les petites et micro-entités : un nouveau guide à l’OEB
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Dessins et Modèles : dommage collatéral de l’influence, ou comment Rihanna détruit le caractère individuel d’un modèle de basket PUMA

Le 6 mars 2024, le Tribunal de l’UE a confirmé la nullité prononcée par l’EUIPO concernant un modèle de basket PUMA. La raison ? Rihanna, anciennement directrice artistique de la marque, s’était affichée en 2014 sur son compte Instagram et son site internet portant le modèle en question, soit bien avant son dépôt auprès de l’office en 2016. Lire la suite

Par Novagraaf Team,
[Blog] Dessins et Modèles : dommage collatéral de l’influence, ou comment Rihanna détruit le caractère individuel d’un modèle de basket PUMA
Blog Nova IP Hour

[Blog] Accélération de la procédure d'opposition en cas d'action parallèle

L'OEB a récemment précisé que la procédure d'opposition serait accélérée si elle est informée par une juridiction nationale ou une administration compétente d'un État contractant qu'une action en contrefaçon ou en nullité concernant le brevet en question a été engagée. Cette mesure vise à favoriser la sécurité juridique, l'économie de la procédure, ainsi que la qualité et la cohérence du système du brevet européen, conformément au communiqué du 7 novembre 2023. Lire la suite

Par Matthieu Boulard,
[Blog] Accélération de la procédure d'opposition en cas d'action parallèle

Pour plus d'informations ou de conseils contactez-nous